The Baltimore Ravens have a solid starting quarterback in Lamar Jackson, but his injury history underscores the need for a more capable backup than Josh Johnson. With that in mind, the Ravens could look to improve their quarterback depth following the release of Daniel Jones by the New York Giants.
Jones, who was granted his release on November 22, 2024, after less than two seasons on a four-year, $160 million contract, could be an intriguing option for the Ravens. Several analysts, including Jimmy Kempski of the Philly Voice, believe Jones would be an upgrade over current backup Josh Johnson, and could be a good fit for several playoff-contending teams, including the Ravens. Kempski noted that Jones’ skill set makes him a potential asset for teams with untested or shaky backups, such as the Ravens, Miami Dolphins, and Detroit Lions.
The Ravens have only Johnson behind Jackson, and as Vinny Iyer of The Sporting News pointed out, they need to add a more reliable backup for 2025. Iyer highlighted that Jones’ arm strength and athleticism could allow him to seamlessly run the same offensive system as Jackson, should Lamar be sidelined. Although some might see replacing 38-year-old Johnson with Jones as an odd move, Iyer’s argument holds weight.
Jones’ playing style is a strong fit for the Ravens’ offensive scheme, which is tailored to dual-threat quarterbacks. While he may not match Jackson’s speed, Jones’ rushing ability is built around power and timing, skills he showcased with a touchdown run against the Colts in 2022. That season was his best, and it featured a system designed around his dual-threat capabilities. Under head coach Brian Daboll, Jones ran 49 RPOs and executed 141 play-action passes, according to Pro Football Reference.
The Ravens run a similar offense under Todd Monken, who has Jackson execute RPOs and play-action at a high rate. This style of play would suit Jones if he were called upon to step in for Jackson. Adding Jones would also give the Ravens a reliable backup who can make big plays when needed, something they may be missing with Johnson, a journeyman quarterback with a mediocre career record.
Given Jackson’s injury history—he missed significant time in both the 2021 and 2022 seasons—the Ravens would benefit from a stronger backup option. While Tyler Huntley’s return didn’t go as planned, Johnson, with his 17-25 career record, is far from a long-term solution. Jones, on the other hand, led the Giants to a playoff appearance and a victory just two seasons ago, proving he can win when given the chance.
The Ravens should consider adding Jones as insurance for Jackson, but only after he clears waivers. If Jones is claimed before then, the Ravens would be responsible for his $11.8 million contract. However, if he clears waivers, the Ravens should quickly move to offer him a short-term, team-friendly deal to solidify their quarterback depth for 2025.
